Choose the intended particle change
Granule sizing reduces irregular or oversized granules to an agreed distribution using a selected rotor and screen arrangement. Screening separates fractions at an aperture; lump breaking disperses agglomerates with an agreed limit on primary-particle damage; milling intentionally reduces raw material into smaller particles; granule formation builds new granules. These are separate buying intentions, even where a catalogue describes overlapping operations.
One documented equipment candidate
The manufacturer explicitly includes the food industry at series level. It has not supplied a named food trial for model 100 here. Confirm the actual food ingredient, moisture, screen aperture, rotor setting, product-contact steel grade, seals, cleaning method and dust-control configuration. A catalogue reference is not an accepted food installation.
Match material and interfaces
Start with the incoming material, moisture, initial distribution and intended outgoing fraction. Specify dry and wet duties separately. Decide whether oversize can be reworked at all; a screening reject does not automatically become suitable food feed after reduction. No model-specific bakery, dairy or seasoning outcome is asserted.
Continue through the existing platform
Official sources and record scope
Official manufacturer pages and the original model table checked on 6 October 2026. Published descriptions support identity and stated duty; they are not an independent registration, factory, food-contact or material-trial audit.
Lump breaking is separate from controlled granule sizing
The Doing LB catalogue concerns lumps and agglomerates; the KZL record remains controlled granule sizing. Neither a shared use of a sieve nor overlapping catalogue language makes them equivalent. Confirm the required particle change and accepted food trial separately.